I was saying that games don't suffer if they lack Easter eggs -- they're just an added bonus. Thus, they shouldn't be something integral to the game, but a small little Easter egg of a find. Inconsequential, but nice.
I had the same view from the start. My point is that instead of asking if I meant something else because you may have misunderstood me, you criticized me for a view that I never had.
The point isn't to make a ****ty game fun, it's to make a fun game have little bits of even more fun.
I criticized a view that you implied. You kept aggrandizing Easter eggs to such a point that it gave the impression that you thought games suffered extensively from lacking them.
And please stop thinking that I'm criticizing you.
Are you seriously attempting to say that not having pointless Easter eggs in this game would make it not fun? That is completely ridiculous.
"That" is not a personal pronoun in this instance. It is referencing an opinion, not a person. Was I criticizing your argument/opinion? Yes. Was I criticizing you? No.

This site sucks.
I have an idea: Maybe you could attempt to generate content you think is good instead of commenting on what you think isn't?
Yeah, arguments aren't exactly fun for the whole family. They also generate activity. If you want other kinds of activity, generate it. Don't sit around and expect it to happen on its own.