Games like Ocarina of Time and Pikmin which they re-did. Sure, they're hits and good with the public but I think the original game should've been respected and kept alone. To me, that's like when a classic movie is made like Karate Kid and then they go and remake it. Yes, it sells and people will like it, but I think it's almost disrespectful to the original.
I also know that it's a lot easier to remake a made game with new controls than to come up with new concepts, so it is, in fact, lazy. I feel like I'm giving in if I purchased a game like that. It's just my natural tendency to rebel against money-making companies.
The whole deal with Pikmin is that a lot of people believed that it would play better with the Wii Remote pointer and it does. I see the New Play Control Pikmin games gives us a taste of how Pikmin 3 will be on the Wii U.
I see how you feel about it disrespecting the original game but that is not how
I see it. The original game is still there on the Gamecube or on the Nintendo 64 just like the original Karate Kid is still out there on VHS, DVD or BluRay. The Pikmin games are like putting the original Karate Kid on DVD. Ocarina of Time 3D is like remastering Karate Kid and putting it on DVD or BluRay. This next one is just an example but Bionic Commando Rearmed is like the recent Karate Kid (no offense to the movie as I haven't seen it).
Basically what I'm saying is that no one is going to look down on the original game (it's first release if it was good back then) just because it was released again on a different system later down the line. The legacy of that game won't be tarnished because of a bad port or something. I kinda went off topic with that.
But something I really don't like are games that are constantly re-released on different consoles from generations ago, (sadly OOT fits in this and Final Fantasy 4).