You seem upset.
Funny, cause you "seemed" upset yourself. Go figure
Nah. You're projecting.
Again, I mentioned him because of the conspiracy theory. I know that most of the studies are clinical and were his, and that's why I'm not a firm believer in the therapy. But if/when someone claims there is a cure then the medical/pharmacutical community may not like it very much seeing as how much money is made on "medicine" and chemo. I can understand why they don't want people to be healthy; it hurts their wallets.
He's not an example of this, though. He's an example of a conman who was rightfully barred from deceiving people in the US. Bringing it up was almost irrelevant.
Also, radiation therapy isn't 100% effective either and makes some people very very ill. I've had relatives who've died from cancer after failed chemo attempts and the canceer wasn't even advanced.
No shi
t. If something that cured cancer was 100% effective, we wouldn't have cancer. But effective is effective even if its success rate isn't perfect, and experimentally and clinically proven to work is better than "Hmm, I
feel like this person has a good chance of recovery based on how they appeared coming into my program and leaving it", which is what "Dr." Gerson did.