That article is so full of crap. Medal of Honor:Heroes 2 for the Wii was NOT a port of the PSP game. It was new as far as the technology is concerned. They developed a new engine just for the Wii version. So right there, their credibility is gone.
The game (Medal of Honor: Heroes 2) was designed FOR PSP, BY a team that had never programmed for a console before, the same team that did MoH:H1 as a PSP exclusive. They thought to themselves,
hey, EA isn't giving MoH:Airborne to Wii, so let's see if we can add Wii to our PSP exclusive franchise and diversify our portfolio a little. It was a port. The Wii version had better graphics and a whole extra mode (the rails mode), but it was a PSP port. It was a good port, and is still one of the best FPS on Wii, but it's a port. Guess what, C&C Red Alert 3 for the PS3 has better graphics than some of the other versions, but the PS3 version is a port of the PC version.
You are full of crap. And I say full, not because some side point that had virtually nothing to do with your post was off, but because your entire point demonstrates pure cluelessness. When you call an article full of crap based on one sentence that 1) had little relationship to the point of the article 2) you didn't understand the point of, and 3) was completely correct; it indicates that, amongst other problems, you don't even know what the word "full" means.
