Banner
Xtra Smileys
[Open]
We Unite Gaming
May 23, 2025, 12:45:09 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to We Unite Gaming!
Formerly Wii Unite/Wii Unite Gaming
 
  Home Help Search Arcade Gallery Youtube Channel Chatbox Staff List Login Register  

Real life versus this game

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Real life versus this game  (Read 434 times)
Mr. Nub
WU Pwn
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Clan: xS
Posts: 1408



View Profile WWW
« on: June 04, 2009, 11:04:38 am »

I've found some flaws in this game about some of the weapons, like the ptrs for example. It's not a sniper rifle it's a gun used to take out tanks.
Please if you have other videos of the differences then please share them with us Afro.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2009, 11:10:46 am by Ryanpwnns » Report Spam   Logged


Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

AoW Aether
WU Combatant
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Clan: Art of Wii
Xbox Live: Aether005
Posts: 771


**** AssHanding for free!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2009, 01:58:07 pm »

lol yeah, technically it was able to be used as a sniper though because of the scope, just kinda like overkill in my opinion. Kinda just like the Barret .50 caliber in Cod4. Damn that thing was definitely overkill. I mean that thing had a fuc.king bipod!!!
Report Spam   Logged

Minimum casualities, Maximum effectiveness...AoW Aether1st Lieutenant in the US Marines.
Mr. Nub
WU Pwn
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Clan: xS
Posts: 1408



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2009, 02:09:09 pm »

I'm not sure but I think the PTRS used explosive shells because it's called an "anti tank rifle."
Report Spam   Logged


Seth
Founding Member
WU Regular
******

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Xbox Live: Ethre
Posts: 194


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2009, 03:01:26 pm »

http://www.antitank.co.uk/ptrs.htm
Report Spam   Logged
AoW Aether
WU Combatant
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Clan: Art of Wii
Xbox Live: Aether005
Posts: 771


**** AssHanding for free!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2009, 04:24:19 pm »

yeah those bullets dont look too explosive to me, powerful? yes, explosive? most likely not. The shell would have to be much larger for a real tank damaging explosion to occur. You do know that the bullet was designed to wipe out certain designated spots on the tank not just kill the tank as some might say...

say...communications, or trying to crack the wheels inside the treads so as to immobilize the tank, but never was it possible to simply shoot the tank to death even with a bullet at the size of an astounding 14.5 mms...

Report Spam   Logged

Minimum casualities, Maximum effectiveness...AoW Aether1st Lieutenant in the US Marines.
AoW Aether
WU Combatant
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Clan: Art of Wii
Xbox Live: Aether005
Posts: 771


**** AssHanding for free!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2009, 04:25:52 pm »

oh yeah just remember that it is only the tip of the bullet that gets fired at the tank, not then entire shell, cuz i remember looking at that shell and saying holy sh.it but then i remembered it really wasnt that big
Report Spam   Logged

Minimum casualities, Maximum effectiveness...AoW Aether1st Lieutenant in the US Marines.
AoW Aether
WU Combatant
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Clan: Art of Wii
Xbox Live: Aether005
Posts: 771


**** AssHanding for free!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2009, 04:28:10 pm »

http://www.antitank.co.uk/russian1.htm
Report Spam   Logged

Minimum casualities, Maximum effectiveness...AoW Aether1st Lieutenant in the US Marines.
AoW puffin
WU Regular
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 119


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2009, 04:34:02 pm »

Not sure but they were probably tipped with depleted Uranium. It's what the tanks use now to get through all sorts of armor. Only guns in this game I've used/shot/owned was the 1911 .45, M1 Garand, and M91/Mosin Nagant. I'm a lot more familiar with the firearms used by our modern military uses currently.

If anything, the MP40 fire rate is too slow and the power was way too high. Also, M1's take a lot longer to reload in real life lolz.
Report Spam   Logged
AoW puffin
WU Regular
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 119


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2009, 04:38:29 pm »

yeah those bullets dont look too explosive to me, powerful? yes, explosive? most likely not. The shell would have to be much larger for a real tank damaging explosion to occur. You do know that the bullet was designed to wipe out certain designated spots on the tank not just kill the tank as some might say...

say...communications, or trying to crack the wheels inside the treads so as to immobilize the tank, but never was it possible to simply shoot the tank to death even with a bullet at the size of an astounding 14.5 mms...



Actually, think of the technology at the time. These guns were most likely used against the old school German Panzers which were notorious for having virtually no rear armor and exposed fuel tanks, etc. 14.5mm is plenty to get through that. Even a 50 cal would've done the job.
Report Spam   Logged
Red Fatality
Guest
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2009, 04:46:00 pm »


"The M1 played a major role in America's victory in WWII. It became a key element in the battle tactics of the U.S. military. On the European front, the Germans were relying on heavy machine gun emplacements and fixed defense positions. In order to overcome such positions, the U.S. used a fire and maneuver strategy. The high rate of fire the M1 had, being a semi-automatic rifle, allowed troops to lay down heavy and accurate cover fire on German positions. This made it possible for groups of soldiers to out-maneuver the less-moveable German machine gun emplacements and overtake them"
Report Spam   Logged
Mr. Nub
WU Pwn
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Clan: xS
Posts: 1408



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2009, 05:50:15 pm »

So does this mean they would waste a bullet on one person? You couldn't just walk around with the PTRS and fire like in CoD.
Report Spam   Logged


TMdudedudedude
Guest
« Reply #11 on: June 04, 2009, 06:44:25 pm »

You would not just walk around like you do in CoD period unless you go nuts.
Report Spam   Logged
Mr. Nub
WU Pwn
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Clan: xS
Posts: 1408



View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: June 04, 2009, 08:36:59 pm »

Hehe.....
Report Spam   Logged


AoW puffin
WU Regular
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 119


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 05, 2009, 02:16:07 pm »

You would not just walk around like you do in CoD period unless you go nuts.

Indeed.
Report Spam   Logged
AoW Aether
WU Combatant
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Clan: Art of Wii
Xbox Live: Aether005
Posts: 771


**** AssHanding for free!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: June 07, 2009, 10:08:09 am »

puffin...have you ever seen a panzer? I watched a documentary on them and it said they could take a few hundred hits from enemy tanks and still function if a full crew was aboard. The old school panzers werent much different.

Also I read that the PTRS was actually only used so as to knock out tank periscopes and other "open" parts of the tank so to blind it as a last resort. The rifles were nowhere near strong enough to actually penetrate the tank...
Report Spam   Logged

Minimum casualities, Maximum effectiveness...AoW Aether1st Lieutenant in the US Marines.
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
© 2008-2014 We Unite Gaming, Wii Unite Gaming, Wii Unite
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy