|
KFactor
|
By signing this contract, does it not apply to teams that did not sign it, or are unaware of it? I think GB rules were pretty straightforward to be honest. There will always be douchebags that dispute and argue. You think there wasn't with the MoH ladder?
For those favoring the MoH ladder system:
Going back to the old MoH ladder will grow old quickly, with the fact that someone will be in charge of running it, (like Bug), and the Conduit community will be split in half with this and GB. Is that the best idea for a well hyped game that could produce a lot of competition? This isn't a cheaply ported game that had 360 and PS3 rules. These will be custom designed for the Wii.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SaintXS
WU Elite

Karma: 0
Offline
Clan: XS
Posts: 350
|
Gamebattles FTMFW. 
|
xS:Saint!
|
|
|
|
Old Baw
|
gamebattles completely ruined any sort of competetive play in waw. in moh, the rules may not have been perfect and there may have been disagreements but that was, for the most part, this community's first try. everyone deserves a second chance. with the people who play the game, partake in the wars, and experience the games making the decisions things will work better. i think that we should have a moderator group that would make rulings, decisions and what have you, and that these people should not be flamed or insulted. they would be chosen just like the great group of mods on wiiunite, hell, we could even just have the mods here be those same mods. if you have a dispute on a cw, don't make a flame topic like old school moh, make a dispute topic. one rep per team may post one at a time, no double posts or edits, and wait for decisons and opinions from mods. on gb random teams could play noobs to get to the top, we can avoid this to a certian degree. we can gain a large group of players and bring them to wiiunite by bringing the competitive play here. i completely support this and i want the old school days of moh, we are the mods, we make the choices, not some random guy who doesn't know the community or never plays in our clan wars.
How could gamebattles have completely ruined competition in WaW when there was many teams with over 50 matches played for that game. Most teams who played MoHH2 had less than 20 matches played and there was so little teams. I think AoW was the only team that had over 25 matches played, correct me if I'm wrong. On Gamebattles there were over 100 teams competing so I don't see how it could have "completely ruined all sort of competitive play" it actually brought more competition since most people have heard of Gamebattles. Having players settle the disputes would create bias, like it or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
aredd007
|
BC, WT, xS, TKO, Gz, We Rep BC all played more gamebattles matches than AoW. xS played the most, over a 100. This was for the Fall season.
|
 - aow.bb2.org
|
|
|
|
Ress
|
I know my opinion doesn't matter, but I'll throw it out there anyway.
I think GameBattles is a better choice than a WU ladder.
That hurt me, considering I love WU.
|
|
|
|
|
Yoooouk
|
Honestly Aredd, I like the smaller community better. Whenever SoL tried to CW in CoD we ran into a bunch of jerks.
|
 Proud Member of MLT
|
|
|
OhioLawyer
Administrator
WU Master
Karma: 9003
Offline
Clan: The Fatal Five
Posts: 8207
Romans 5:8
|
well, it appears many people have missed Zzz's point here. I think having teams that go to WU and are playing each other submit to posting and approving their rules publicly is a good idea. It should help cut down on the whining. And since this still is based on agreement between the clans themselves, there is no one else involved in decision making. Which by the way, I would strongly advise against WU mods being some sort of council. That has bad new written all over it.
|
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
|
|
|
Mr. coolguy Sethman
WU Elite

Karma: 0
Offline
Clan: The Elitist Connection
Posts: 312
I'm so serious
|
I'd be a mod, because I hate all you ****ers equally, and show no bias.  And the fact that TEC won't keep up with 80 games a season, methinks. Meh, whatever, choose who you want.
|
I'm a tricky little devil who doesnt afraid of anything and will eat yer children if your lolcat isn't over 9000.
|
|
|
MessakiNg
the one and only
Global Moderator
WU Pwn
    
Karma: 6
Offline
Clan: WTCLAN
Xbox Live: MessakiN
Posts: 1952
|
i think a few people in this thread def misunderstood. its not about making a ladder kids go back and read again.
|
|
|
|
SaintXS
WU Elite

Karma: 0
Offline
Clan: XS
Posts: 350
|
I know it's not about making a ladder, but if you're going to be using gamebattles ladder you should be using gamebattles rules, not a 24 year old pervert's rules : to prevent any disputes and arguement later. The rules will be fair because the game is WII exclusive like KFactor said, the only problem with the cod rules now imo is the hosting, friendly fire I don't even mind so much.
However go ahead and take a look at the Conduit rules, higher ranked hosts last 2 games, so the higher ranked you are the more advantage you have : this is a lot better and fair for Wii users, they are beginning to understand (don't say bug's rule is better, because it can only be applied with TDM mode: gamebattles scrambles up the maps and modes).
|
xS:Saint!
|
|
|
wtZzz
WU Elite

Karma: 16
Offline
Posts: 439
|
Lets wait until the game comes out before you morons make assumptions about the rules. Gamebattles is a joke. It is run by people that don't even play Wii games. Kids rely on lame technicalities to steal wins. Kids delay match results. Kids play the same clans over and over.
We need to make the competition more public, like it used to be.
But that wasnt the point of my original post you idiots. I am saying that all clan wars should have rules posted and signed by both teams. This way, everyone knows who is the liar in the end. If a team lies to admins and gets the win, we will all know who really won.
There is no gaurantee that GB rules will represent us, in fact, I plan on them being as lame as they were for COD.
In MOHH2, yes we didn't have tons of teams. It is true GB is more popular. However, we need to ensure the players control the competitive scene so that it benefits us the most.
Players like Aredd and Saint will fight for GB because they know they can't win without being closet flamers.
All wars I play in will have the fuckin rules signed in public before hand, and I suggest you all do the same so that your team doesn't get any bogus losses.
Clan Council hated AOW because AOW CHEATED. Don't talk smack on clan council, that was the most civil thing to ever happen to us.
However, the golden age is over, but we can still fight for fair play.
**** gamebattles, but we're stuck with it now. So we need to make sure we fill the holes and make it fair for everyone. I suggest when you add your teams you all post a link to the rule contracts section of wiiunite in your team description.
1 Bad thing about gamebattles is that there are teams full of alts. Also, if a team does need to reschedule, they shouldn't be forced to lose. That is male cattle dung that people get losses. **** happens in life and you can't always play. Only a coward takes a win like that.
Rule Contracts are the right thing to do
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ress
|
So, you will still use GB? But for the clans that go here to WU, you will use pre-determined rules and for the unknown GB teams you will just use GB rules?
|
|
|
|
wtZzz
WU Elite

Karma: 16
Offline
Posts: 439
|
no, all teams will register here and sign my god damn contract. i want everything notarized
|
|
|
|
|
SaintXS
WU Elite

Karma: 0
Offline
Clan: XS
Posts: 350
|
Just because gamebattles rules don't represent you, doesn't mean they don't represent us. AoW never cheated and they lead a clan better than you did and proved to be the best CoD clan, with XS LITERALLY right behind them. so don't talk **** about me or aredd. We didn't even follow gamebattle rules for playoffs because they were a bit screwed up there, but for the regular season games, minus the hosting rule (which they already fixed ahead of time for The Conduit), there is nothing wrong with the CoD rules right now.
By playing on gamebattles ladder teams agree to play by gamebattles rules. What's the difference if teams play by your rules? Have two different sets of rules will only cause in even more disputes so your reasoning is false. If you record wars you should be fine with disputes on both gamebattles and "your" rules, so just stick with gamebattles. Don't make things confusing when they shouldn't be. If clans want to make topics to go over rules for wars, let them do it... but you don't have to go all nuts with making rules and getting every clan to sign them. Rules you like may not be rules other people like anyways. There's no way to completely satisfy every single person which is why gamebattles keeps everything BALANCED.
|
xS:Saint!
|
|
|
The Krazy One
The Nintendo Guy
Administrator
WU Pwn
Karma: 7
Offline
Clan: TaKeOver
Nintendo Network ID: TKrazyO
Posts: 2236
|
Zzz, that last reply makes it seem like you are trying to force other clans into this idea you have. Maybe not with other clans in general, but with situations of going against your team since it would be your contract. If the clan is based from Gamebattles, you should contact them there instead of making them come here to a place they most likely won't stay. Feel free to poke at any info that might be wrong with what I said.
|
"Use the pain of loss! The power comes in response to a need, not a desire!" "The power comes in response to a need! You have to create that need!" - Goku, Dragonball Z
|
|
|
|
|
|