|
aredd007
|
 |
« on: July 28, 2009, 03:16:24 pm » |
|
Vote!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 28, 2009, 05:04:54 pm by aredd007 »
|
Report Spam
Logged
|
 - aow.bb2.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TMdudedudedude
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2009, 03:29:07 pm » |
|
CoD > MoH > TC
|
|
|
|
|
OhioLawyer
Administrator
WU Master
Karma: 9003
Offline
Clan: The Fatal Five
Posts: 8207
Romans 5:8
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2009, 03:30:21 pm » |
|
I find this one hard. I really liked certain things about all three but all three had major issues. For overall experience I would have to go with MoH as the best. It had a great lobby system that facilitated a great community and clan environment and allowed us to spend hours on end having fun in the game. But it really was a crappy game outside of that. Few maps, few weapons, tons of lag, tons of glitches.
However, I have the oppossite issue with TC. It is a really fun game with a good amount of decent maps, and a good variety of weapons. Overall a better game once you are playing (no real lag shooting either). But the matchmaking is dreadful and the spawn glitch makes it such a pain.
Then you have CoD. That game seemed to fail as a playing experience and also lacked the lobby system of MoH, but I LOVED the leveling up system, the shear number of various weapons and customization of them. And the weapons classes were great. If only TC allowed classes. But because it failed in one way or another on both of these areas it seems to consistantly fall into last place for me.
|
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
|
|
|
Mum
WU Peacemaker
WU Guru
Karma: 50
Offline
Clan: OG
Posts: 11700
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2009, 06:54:11 pm » |
|
You always have so much to say Ohio 
|
|
|
|
|
Ress
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2009, 07:19:13 pm » |
|
I'd have to go MoH > TC > CoD.
CoD was a failed port from the beginning.
|
|
|
|
|
TMdudedudedude
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2009, 07:21:49 pm » |
|
As were the other two since they were released on the Wii.
|
|
|
|
|
**Triad**
WU Regular

Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 90
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2009, 08:00:08 pm » |
|
TC>CoD>MoH for me. Though if COD had half the modes & didn't have hit detection issues then it woulda been: COD>TC>MOH I can't help think that TC would have been better if EA published it as opposed to Sega... 
|
Now playing conduit instead of COD WAW
Former No.1 for everything & best score for time on COD WAW...
|
|
|
SaintXS
WU Elite

Karma: 0
Offline
Clan: XS
Posts: 350
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2009, 11:14:37 pm » |
|
CoD>MoH>TC
I just wish I didn't miss the whole MoH era.
|
xS:Saint!
|
|
|
TheFRENCHFLY
WU Regular

Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 158
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: July 29, 2009, 01:13:10 am » |
|
you would have to suffer from extreme intellectual limitations to not recognize the conduit's superiority.
NO LAG, tons of game modes, no outrageously unbalanced weapons (mp40), best graphics, character customization, best death animations (no freezing in the air and fading like moh), etc., etc., etc.
TC>COD>MoH
|
|
|
|
|
TheFRENCHFLY
WU Regular

Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 158
|
the main reason people like MoH best is simply nostalgia. which really isn't a good reason at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ress
|
wat
WaW has the best graphics. Characters fade when they die in TC.
|
|
|
|
TheFRENCHFLY
WU Regular

Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 158
|
waw doesn't have the best graphics. it's blurry as hell. bodies fade in tcon but it is done in a much cooler manner (dissolving and sometimes shimmering). moh just has the frozen standing bodies that look ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ress
|
I must say that WaW has the best gfx out of the three,
|
|
|
|
TheFRENCHFLY
WU Regular

Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 158
|
i think the conduit had cooler effects. the carbonizer, the strike rifle's orange globe, the glowing deatomizer, etc.
also, ign gave conduit an 8.5 on graphics while cod got an 8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|