LOL you are clueless man. I stated male and female is genetic. Do you deny that? I sure hope not, it is called an x and y chromosome. Since my argument that heterosexuality is the natural way, then there is no contradiction. You make me laugh at your inability to reason this out. I make the statement that there is no sexual orientation gene (and there is not) therefore homosexuality is not genetic. Then you question whether or not heterosexuality is genetic. I state that it is not, but that those things that show heterosexuality as natural/biological CAN be found in our genes. Then now you are all confused thinking there is a contradiction when there is not. I still contend that there is no gene for sexual orientation. I also contend that heterosexuality is natural and biological. I also contend that our makeup of male and female IS genetic. There is no contradiction there. Sorry you can't read.
And then to address you point on Leviticus 20. I will give you a pass since you yourself stated you know very little about the bible. But the book of leviticus is a book of law given by God, to the nation of Israel. It is the establishment of national law. Nowhere is leviticus 20 purporting that God is to carry out those punishments. Those are laws given to the government of the nation to carry out. Much like America's death penalty. Those laws are for our system to carry out accordingly. Not any individual, and not God. God stated many times in the bible that vengeance belongs to him and that he is longsuffering with sin until the day of judgment. None of the declarations of death penalty in the hebrew law were ever to be carried out by God in this life. They were for establishing law and order within the nation of Israel. God's judgment comes later.
Sorry, but you are the clueless one. Do we have to go back to the discussions you had with DDD about reading and understanding what you read. Your statement clearly infers that heterosexuality is genetic. Just because you are too stubborn to admit your contradiction does not mean that I can't read or comprehend. On the contrary, I read exactly what you inferred (that heterosexuality is genetic) and now you are trying to cover up your contradiction by claiming I can't read. Sorry, go ahead and use that argument on DDD, but it is not accurate in this case. You can't call people stupid to cover up your mistakes Ohio.
How does the statement "Clearly heterosexuality is in our genes" imply that heterosexuality is biological and not genetic? IN OUR GENES definitely implies you believe it is genetic. But you clearly stated that sexual orientation, which heterosexuality is, is biological.
Which is it Ohio? Genetic or Biological? You stated that they are two different things, so just pick one. Then maybe you can get back some credibility.
Don't attack me just because you made a mistake. It's your typical tactic. Attack the other person's ability to comprehend to cover up the fact that you made a mistake. You can put all the LOLs in that you want, but that doesn't erase your contradiction.