OhioLawyer
Administrator
WU Master
Karma: 9003
Offline
Clan: The Fatal Five
Posts: 8207
Romans 5:8
|
UGH you are absolutely stupid. Seriously. How much more clearly can I spell it out?
I said there is no sexual orientation gene. I have yet to say there was.
I said heterosexuality is biological. I followed this statement by the argument that it is biological because male and female biologically are designed to procreate together.
Then I state that male and female is genetic.
Then I made the statement that you clearly are ignorant about that "clearly heterosexuality is in our genes."
This statement is in no way a contradiction to my previous statements. It is merely deductive reasoning in drawing a conclusion based on the facts. There is no sexual orientation gene. That doesn't mean that other things related to sex aren't genetic (i.e. male and female). And since those things are the basis for my point that heterosexuality is biological, and those things are genetic, therefore the argument stands based on sound logic, that heterosexuality is in our genes.
Do I need to be more clear? There is obviously no contradiction there. You are simply an idiot.
Let me give you another unrelated example to see if you can wrap your mind around it. There is no gene for gamgling (I hope you can agree so far). So I could easily state gambling is not genetic. However, there ARE genes that control brain development with regards to impulse control and addictive behavior. Those things are invariably tied to gambling. So while gambling is not genetic, for someone whose genes relating to risk factors for gambling are present, it could be said that "gambling is in their genes."
There is not contradiction there, just sound logic in connecting two statements because they rely on the same underlying evidence.
This cannot be more clear. If you do not understand it from this post, you never will.
|
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|