I appreciate the time it took you to write this. I'll make a few comments.
Firstly, I will state that I haven't read the bible cover to cover, but that doesn't mean I've had no exposure to religion, the bible, etc. So, I have the right frame of mind when reading the bible. The reason I brought up Leviticus in the first place is that Ohio stated he believed and followed every word of the bible. So, I just wanted to point out that there are pieces of the bible that didn't seem to be followed in modern day.
Now, you two both state that Leviticus is for Israel only. I ask why? Why only Israel? Why not the rest of God's followers? Different rules? Isn't that discrimination? I would think we all live by a standard set of rules in order to be judged by him in a fair manner.
You stated that the laws were from that time, where is the updated bible describing the laws that should be followed today? You are saying that we are to follow the laws of the land even if they contradict what is written in the bible? That's very confusing. How do you know when the laws of the land go too far? How do you know which ones to follow if there are a number of contradictions? For example, if the laws of the land state that kechua marriage is legal then shouldn't priests, pastors, ministers, etc have to perform kechua marriages? If they don't then they are going against the laws of the land.
Yes, I have heard about the baptismal symbolism

You and Ohio disagreed on who should carry out the punishments in Leviticus. To me, it's not clear as to who should carry out those punishments; however, I don't understand how God can put someone to death if there is heaven and hell....symbolically speaking you could say that death means eternal punishment, but why didn't he just say that? Why didn't he say eternal damnation. Isn't that phrase used elsewhere in the bible? If so, then that would lead me to believe he meant death in our lifetime. I'm deducing here

So, that means the people should be the judge and not God as we haven't seen God kill these people. You are saying that we aren't killing these people because times have changed and we can ignore those laws now. Or those only applied to Israel. And if those apply to Israel then I assume they are still valid laws...I haven't checked the laws of Israel, but I'm guessing they don't follow them as they are written.
That brings me back to my initial questions....How do we know what laws we can ignore?