It's not about the concept of someone being wrong, it's the concept that one particular lawyer thinks he's above everyone else.

Not everyone else. Just you and term and the brain cell you share that can't comprehend that something being genetic is very different from there being a specific gene/allele for that trait. Maybe read a medical textbook and get back to me.
Right, because you are a lawyer and therefore an expert on biology, genetics, logic, and anything else you decide to open your mouth about.
Show me where I'm wrong then smart guy. I assumed it was basic scientific knowledge that just because something is "genetic" doesn't mean there is a specific allele on the genome that controls it (i.e. some cancers can be "genetic" yet there is no cancer gene). I thought this was simple enough that I didn't need to bring in an expert to show you. I gave your intelligence too much credit to start with, and for that I applogize. It won't happen again.