I said you had to have aquiesced to his position
I don't give a flying fu
ck about Terminator's views or opinions on genetics or yours for that matter. I don't know enough to protest anyones beliefs. What I do know about, is arguments. A contradictory statement instantly nullifies the validity and consistency of an argument.
While I contend that I did not contradict myself because the way I used the terms actually gels without a contradiction if you understand genetics.
I don't need to understand biology to know that someone is saying polar opposite statements. Unless you want to contest what "in our genes" means, you have no argument.
Now you don't believe that you contradicted yourself, which basically means you can't read. Terminator already displayed exactly where you went wrong and I will do it again for you.
There does not exist a sexual orientation gene.
There are many genes for male and female. Clearly heterosexuality is in our genes.
How can you not see two contradictory statements? They are polar opposites. It doesn't take an expert in human genes to see this. This statement breaks the law of non-contradiction The people who derived what an argument is came up with the law of non-contradiction and you seriously want to say that it's not contradictory?
P = There exist a sexual orientation gene
`P= There exist no sexual orientation gene
This is a textbook example. I should submit this for the next copy of the Reasoning and Critical thinking and I'm sure they would use it.
you have now resorted to childish gameplaying.
You actually want to tell people this? Last time I checked, you started this pages ago. This has to be the most hypocritical statement to date on here. You run out of arguments, so you fill the page with meaningless bulls
hit and random name calling.
But thanks for the list of my accomplishments. It further cements the fact that rather than address the issues, you would rather defer to your weak sense of humor.
Weak > None
you would rather attack me than make a valid argument.
Take a page out of your own book. This is attacking Term, not making a valid argument. See how much time you waste?
You call me arrogant, yet you ask us all to assume you are right because you say so and that by making fun of me you are somehow adding to your argument
I'm sure your character count would be half the size if you actually listened to your own advice.