The point is that my logic has no flaws. Based on my beliefs, my logic is flawless.
Honestly, I've never laughed so hard at a statement. Obviously, according to your beliefs, you think it's correct but that doesn't mean you are right.
Can you at least understand that based on the belief in my last post that there is no contradiction? I believe heterosexuality is inborn (i.e. in our genes) and I also believe there is no gene for sexual orientation. Based on those beliefs, there is no contradiction.
Yes I understand your belief but I'm proving to you that it is not possible. If heterosexuality is inborn, it must come from somewhere. Whether its a mutation or its a gene, it must come from somewhere in the DNA. This means that homosexuality must also come from the DNA. It's fine that you believe heterosexuality is inborn, but saying homosexuality is not makes it a contradiction.
And as for your point about cancer, the fact that the gene mutates is irrelevant. The point is that there is no gene for cancer. So clearly there is more going on in genetics than simply what genes do and do not exist. Whether it be mutation, or errors in cell division/duplication, or any other factor, the fact is that which genes we have is not the end of genetics.
That's totally fine but you have to be consistent with your logic. The inconsistency arises when you say that heterosexuality is inborn but homosexuality is not. It's either they both are, or they both are not. That's already known. The scientific debate is whether sexual orientation is inborn or not, not whether homosexuality is inborn and heterosexuality is not and vice-versa.
I can't personally tell you what the correct answer is, because I don't know but I am able to tell you that your logic is inconsistent.
So by bringing up mutation, you have actually proved my point that genetics is much more than just which genes are present.
I'm not arguing that, they are much more than the genes presented but your logic is flawed in the way that you present it now. Genetic mutation backs up the fact that heterosexuality and homosexuality are either both "in the genes" as you put it or not.