I don't disagree with the concept of a reportive definition, I am saying I disagree with this particular reportive definition. Reportive definitions are based on common understanding in greater society. I am certainly free to disagree with society as a whole on certain topics. I do everyday, and so do you I'm sure.
In this case, the only time I referred to "sexual orientation" the reportive definition that I disagree with, was to state there is no gene for it. In making that statement, the fact that I disagree with the reportive definition is irrelevant to the issue of whether or not there is a gene for it. It was my other statement that Term claims contradicts that statement, and in that statement, I did NOT use the term sexual orientation. Term simply attempted to apply "sexual orientation" to my statement to find a contradiction.
Sexual orientation is something that is not up for debate. It's a scientific term defining which sex an individual is interested in. If homosexuality is not a sexual orientation, what is it?