OhioLawyer
Administrator
WU Master
Karma: 9003
Offline
Clan: The Fatal Five
Posts: 8207
Romans 5:8
|
LOL so you just begun understanding what I was saying the last few pages (even though I've been saying it since this started) and I'm the one being silly? LOL
But no, I am not wrong. Debating a person using a reportive definition so that they understand it does not render my own beliefs invalid. Sorry, you are wrong. I can choose to debate you using terms that you will understand and still preserve the fact that I disagree with those terms. I chose to use the phrase "sexual orientation" when stating there was no gene for it, so that the reader would know what I was speaking of, rather than posting an entire treatise on why I don't believe in sexual orientation as commonly understood.
Maybe when dealing with an argumentative prick like yourself who is just out to attempt to catch people in false, and perceived contradictions, rather than add anything useful to the actual topic at hand, I should resort to writing such lengthy responses rather than simplify for the reader.
But then again, prior to your ignorant statements attempting to call me out, you had not interjected yourself into this discussion, so how could I have possibly predicted your response and crafted my phrasing just for you anyway?
|
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|