Arguing what the definition of sexual orientation is like me arguing the definition of a cat. If I say a cat is actually a printer, I am wrong. It's not up for debate whether I believe it is a printer or not. Saying that sexual orientation isn't ones sexual attraction to a certain sex is ignorant and incredibly hilarious. What is sexual orientation then? You've used so many times, I figure you better tell me what your incorrect definition of the word is, just shits and giggles.
lol @ this ignorance. A cat is a tangible thing with well established scientific information delineating it from other creatures. Sexual orientation is a socially created concept devised in the last 50 years to fit into society's growing acceptance of homosexuality. There is no hard data to support any such definition, only societal norms. Comparing the two is ridiculous. LOL. A tangible animal and an abstract concept. LOL You are a smart one.
Although if you understood logic at all, you would also understand that even "cat" is debateable. Say a scientist uncovers an ancient animal with certain feline characteristics (which this type of thing happens regularly). There is often a long scientific debate if this newly discovered animal is in fact a cat, and further, oftentimes such newly discovered beings help mold and modify the existing definition of the original term. Species classifications change in their detail all the time because of this.
Anything can be debated and NOTHING is exempt from it. Thinking it is so just shows the limitations of your capacity to think and reason.