When did I say I didn't want Trump investigated?
Why are you acting like you're explicitly required to say a specific thing for someone to be able to infer what your intentions are? That's a rhetorical question; I know why.
This whole conversation started with you asking about it
I asked what you expected the House to do with the Senate and Executive held by an openly hostile party, and what you considered the Democrats' agenda to be. You have yet to answer either of those questions.
Just because I laugh at the "evidence" you put forth and see right through the democrats facade of moral superiority doesn't mean I like Trump (I like some of his policies, dislike many, and can't stand him as a person).
But you didn't vote against him, did ya?
What evidence have I put forth? I've only mentioned what the central focus for the articles of impeachment were. Meanwhile you've been over here tipping your fedora and chuckling to yourself about how
you are just
too smart to be fooled by the nefarious Demon-rats' attempts to conceal their true aims of the impeachment, which is to... use the mechanisms defined in the constitution to put a suspected criminal on trial? Which is apparently some huge affront to the integrity of this country, according to you.
Oh, and Handy, maybe if you had more than a high school civics course YOU would understand more of the process. As someone who brings charges against people, I have an ethical obligation not to bring charges that I don't believe there is a reasonable likelihood of conviction.
hahahahahahaha
I love how, even when trying to defend your profession as ethical, you can't help but out yourself by thinking
conviction is a confirmation of guilt. That's not the ethical consideration -- plenty of people who are convicted aren't actually guilty, as proved by the Innocence Project, and consequently the
ethical thing to do would be to only charge those you believe to be guilty, not those who you simply think will be convicted.
I'm sure you'll wash your hands of that particular responsibility by telling us that it is up to the broader legal system (whether jury or judge or what have you) to determine guilt, but that doesn't resolve your ethical responsibility, even if you somehow had deluded yourself into believe that the justice system was actually just.